The Nashville Statement: Evangelical Confession on Marriage and Sexuality

Ordained Minister, M.Div.
July 27, 2026
3 min read

The Nashville Statement, released in August 2017, is one of the most significant — and most controversial — evangelical confessional documents of the twenty-first century. Produced by the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and signed by hundreds of evangelical leaders, it represents a deliberate act of confessional definition at a moment when cultural pressure on traditional Christian sexual ethics was intensifying.
The Context: Why a Statement Was Needed
The years before 2017 had seen the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States (2015), rapidly shifting cultural attitudes, and significant divisions within evangelical institutions over how to respond. Some evangelical leaders and organizations were reconsidering traditional positions. The Nashville Statement was partly a boundary marker — a public assertion that the signatories held and intended to maintain the historic Christian teaching on marriage and sexuality.
The Structure of the Statement
The Nashville Statement follows the classic confessional pattern of affirmations and denials — directly echoing the Barmen Declaration's structure. Fourteen articles cover marriage (between man and woman), sexual purity before marriage, transgender identity, and the relationship between homosexual desire and Christian faithfulness. Each article pairs a positive statement ('We affirm') with a negative one ('We deny'), following the historic confessional pattern of defining truth by excluding falsehood.
Reception and Controversy
The Nashville Statement was received enthusiastically by traditionalist evangelicals and harshly criticized by progressive evangelicals and mainline Protestants. Critiques focused on its tone (perceived as harsh toward LGBTQ+ persons), its completeness (accused of omitting pastoral nuance), and its Article 10 (which implied that affirming homosexual relationships was incompatible with Christian faithfulness). Defenders argued that confessional clarity, while uncomfortable, was essential for the church's integrity.
The Nashville Statement as Modern Confession
Whether one agrees with its conclusions or not, the Nashville Statement illustrates what modern confessions do: they address specific contemporary challenges with the specific doctrinal resources of the Christian tradition. Like Barmen (which addressed Nazism), Belhar (which addressed apartheid), and the Lausanne Covenant (which addressed the relationship of evangelism and social action), Nashville addressed a particular cultural crisis with confessional specificity. Its significance will be assessed in retrospect.
What the Nashville Statement Reveals About Evangelical Confessionalism
The Nashville Statement reveals both the strength and the vulnerability of evangelical confessionalism. Its strength: evangelicals can produce clear, structured, theologically serious confessional documents when they choose to. Its vulnerability: without ecclesiastical structures to receive and enforce confessional standards, such documents depend entirely on voluntary subscription and informal social pressure. The statement has influenced evangelical institutions but has no formal authority over any church.

