Your Cart

Your cart is empty.

Writing New Confessions: Can the Church Still Confess in Our Age?

Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.
By Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.

Ordained Minister, M.Div.

June 6, 2026

2 min read

Oil painting of a modern theologian writing a confession by lamplight surrounded by ancient manuscripts and open Bibles

When we study the Nicene Creed or the Westminster Confession, it is easy to think of confessional writing as something that belongs to the past — produced by bishops at councils or divines at assemblies, sealed and delivered to us across the centuries. The present age, by contrast, can seem either too fragmented to produce consensus documents or too comfortable to be under the kind of pressure that historically has generated confessions. But both assumptions are wrong.

The Pressure That Produces Confession

Confessions have always been produced under pressure — the pressure of heresy, persecution, political co-optation, or theological confusion. Our age is not short of these. The pressure of a secular culture that defines humanity without reference to God, the pressure of a therapeutic Christianity that reduces faith to self-improvement, the pressure of political polarization that tempts churches to become chaplains to their preferred party — these are genuine challenges to the integrity of Christian witness. They create the need for confession.

What a Modern Confession Requires

A genuine confession must be grounded in Scripture, consistent with the ecumenical creeds, responsive to the specific challenges of its context, and produced by a community that takes both truth and unity seriously. It must say "yes" and "no" — affirming the truth and rejecting its distortions. And it must be willing to cost something: a confession that requires nothing of those who sign it is not a confession but a publicity document.

The Barmen Declaration, the Lausanne Covenant, the Nashville Statement, the Cape Town Commitment, and other modern confessional documents show that the church has not lost the capacity to confess. They are uneven in quality and contested in reception, as confessional documents have always been. But they represent the church's ongoing attempt to say, in its own day, what it believes and what it rejects. That attempt is part of what it means to be the church.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the church still write new confessions of faith today?

Yes. The history of the church shows that every generation has expressed the one apostolic faith in its own words and addressed the challenges of its own era. The Barmen Declaration (1934), the Lausanne Covenant (1974), and the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978) are 20th-century examples of the church confessing its faith in response to specific challenges.

What distinguishes a legitimate new confession from theological novelty?

A legitimate new confession articulates the same apostolic faith in new language while remaining accountable to Scripture and the received tradition. Theological novelty makes claims that contradict or go beyond what Scripture teaches. The test is always whether a new confession says the same thing the church has always believed, or something different.

What challenges does writing a confession face in a pluralistic age?

A pluralistic age raises questions about authority: who has the right to define orthodoxy, and for whom? Modern confessions must navigate denominational fragmentation, cultural pressure to minimize doctrinal difference, and suspicion of institutional authority. These challenges make confessional clarity harder to achieve but no less necessary.

Why might the church today need new confessional statements?

New confessions are needed when new challenges threaten the integrity of the gospel. Just as Nicaea arose to answer Arianism and the Westminster Confession arose to answer 17th-century controversies, the church today faces challenges — from secular ideology, theological revisionism, and cultural fragmentation — that call for articulate, confessional responses.